This silencer was purchased new in 1994. It was made by Dale Blaylock, dba Blaylock's Gun Works, or BGW. He was located in the aptly named town of Gun Barrel City, Texas (abbreviated GBC on the markings on the silencer). This is the AR 30 model, which is a .30 caliber can meant for .308 (7.62x51) rifles. It is entirely made out of steel, and can be disassembled. The tube is 10 inches in length, 1.5 inches in diameter (ID). The design would not be considered state of the art by today's (2012) standards. However, it was made in 1994. It consists of 13 removable baffles, with 14 spacers. 12 of the baffles are a stamped cone type design, and the first or blast baffle is a much thicker piece of plate steel, turned on a lathe to make a cone shape. 13 of the spacers are the same height, the last is a smaller one to take up remaining space before the end cap. Assembly is pretty straightforward, the baffles are interspersed with the spacers, with a spacer going in toward the rear of the silencer first, followed by the blast baffle, followed by a spacer and then the remaining stamped baffles and spacers.
The silencer also includes two end caps, which attach to the tube at each end via 1.5 x 24 tpi threads, and which are removable. The rear one on this model is threaded 9/16x24 tpi LH for attaching it to the muzzle threads on a FN-FAL. The rear cap is also marked with the serial number, and different end caps were available, threaded for other patterns. This rear end cap was machined after the fact with two flats so a wrench could be used if required to remove the silencer from the rifle. The front end cap has two holes in it so a face spanner wrench can be used to unscrew it. The rear end cap was attached with a thread locking glue, and does not seem to have been meant to be removed on a regular basis.
This first picture shows the tube, with the markings highlighted with white paint, and the two end caps. The markings are at the front end of the silencer, opposite where it attaches to the rifle.
This second picture shows the tube, the end caps, the blast baffle and an example of the spacer and stamped baffle.
This third picture shows the opposite side of the internal components shown in the 2nd picture.
Here are two views of the tube and the internal components stacked as they would be assembled inside the tube, side by side.
This view shows all the internal components of the silencer. They are arrayed as they would go in the tube, starting in the upper left corner with the rear end cap, and moving to the right, row by row. The front end cap in at the bottom right.
Random Guns
Saturday, December 8, 2012
Friday, November 23, 2012
Removing the magazine disconnect "safety" in the Ruger(tm) SR22(tm)pistol
I dislike magazine disconnect safeties. I think they create a false sense of security, as removing the magazine should never be considered to render an auto pistol safe for handling. The chamber must be unloaded, in addition to removing the magazine. Magazine safeties are typically popular in European pistols. In addition in a few but significant U.S. court cases, attorneys for persons injured by unintentional gunshots have successfully argued that a pistol made without a magazine safety was defective, and thus the maker of the pistol had liability to the person injured or killed. This despite the fact that the more proximate cause of the injury was that someone pulled the trigger, not that the firearm lacked a mechanical device that hypothetically would have prevented the unintentional discharge of the firearm. No one should be able to claim that a gun that fired when the trigger was pulled is somehow defective.
In any case, the Ruger (tm) SR22 (tm) pistol comes with a magazine disconnect safety. As with virtually all magazine safeties, it interferes with the normal operation of the trigger bar, and removing it allows the firearm to function as it was meant to. In other words, pulling the trigger activates the hammer and if there is a cartridge in the chamber, it will discharge. If having the firearm function in this entirely normal manner is an issue for you, you shouldn't remove the magazine safety. Additionally, if you are not mechanically inclined you probably shouldn't take your pistol apart to the degree required.
First, strip the pistol according to the factory directions. Then remove the barrel according to the directions in the manual. You will then have something like that shown below. Remove the roll pin below the manual safety. It is hard to remove, it seems to have a crimp or bend in it to prevent its easy removal. Do not remove the solid pin above the magazine release. That pin retains the magazine catch and spring; removing it is not needed for this operation.
When you remove the roll pin the gun will not come apart. It is sort of clamped in the front. There is probably a clever technique for freeing the trigger assembly from the plastic frame, but I don't know it. I found what worked well was to tap on the exposed trigger frame assembly where the takedown lever latches with a punch, and that frees it up.
Some parts will figuratively speaking explode when you do this. There is a spring and plunger that fit between the plastic grip and the trigger assembly that act on the trigger bar, as shown in the picture above. Don't lose them, you'll need them. When you separate the plastic grip and the trigger assembly these parts will be free to disappear; whatever technique you use to free up the front part of the trigger assembly needs to also make sure these two small parts don't go far.
The slide stop and its spring will probably also come loose, as they are retained by being pinched in place inside the plastic grip. In the picture above the spring for the slide stop is actually in upside down; the shorter leg of the slide stop spring goes on the bottom of the trigger assembly; the picture shows it on the top.
The above pictures shows the right side of the trigger assembly, this is the internal mechanism of the pistol. As it is marked with the serial number, legally speaking (in the USA) it is the pistol. You will need to remove the two #1 phillips screws and the safety lever. The longer screw goes closer to the hammer. That longer screw also retains the ejector, it may come out when you remove the screw. No problem, just remember to put it back when you reassemble the gun.
The safety lever can just be pried out carefully. It has a roll pin that blocks the trigger bar when it is engaged, and also connects it to the lever on the opposite side of the trigger assembly.
At this point you can carefully pry the sideplate off the assembly. You will end up with a situation like that pictured above. The magazine safety is pushing the trigger bar down. Remove the trigger bar, remove the magazine safety (its the block and spring just behind the trigger, that's pushing the bar down), and replace the trigger bar.
Now you can reassemble the gun. Start by putting the sideplate back on. It retains the trigger, the trigger bar, and the axle for the safety, so it will have to be carefully wiggled into place. You may have to push the safety axle up a hair behind the plate with a small screwdriver or punch, so it will go into the hole for it in the sideplate, then pull the tool out and push the sideplate the rest of the way into place. Replace the safety lever and the screws. You may have to use a small punch to move the hammer blocking safety assembly back into alignment for the rear screw to go back into place. Don't forget to replace the ejector if it came out; it's retained by that rear screw.
Now you put the slide stop and its spring back into place, and put the trigger bar spring and plunger into place. Now you can tuck the entire assembly back into the plastic grip frame. Before you replace the roll pin, pull the trigger without the magazine in place and make sure it now works the hammer. If it doesn't you probably didn't get the trigger bar spring and plunger back into place. When you're sure everything works, reinstall the roll pin. Now you can reassemble the rest of the pistol following the factory directions.
One downside to removing the magazine safety is that the magazine will no longer be forcefully ejected from the gun when you push the mag release button. You may have to pull it out. I don't consider this to be a downside, but some folks might.
As noted above, now the gun will work whether a magazine is in place or not. Supervise the use of the firearm accordingly. If you decide to sell/give it away consider reinstalling the safety. Always be sure that anyone you teach anything about firearms knows that with every auto pistol removing the magazine is not substitute for clearing the chamber and removing the magazine. Merely removing the magazine does not make the pistol safe in any sense of the word, whether the pistol has a magazine safety, or not. Devices like the one on this pistol encourage that erroneous thinking.
In any case, the Ruger (tm) SR22 (tm) pistol comes with a magazine disconnect safety. As with virtually all magazine safeties, it interferes with the normal operation of the trigger bar, and removing it allows the firearm to function as it was meant to. In other words, pulling the trigger activates the hammer and if there is a cartridge in the chamber, it will discharge. If having the firearm function in this entirely normal manner is an issue for you, you shouldn't remove the magazine safety. Additionally, if you are not mechanically inclined you probably shouldn't take your pistol apart to the degree required.
First, strip the pistol according to the factory directions. Then remove the barrel according to the directions in the manual. You will then have something like that shown below. Remove the roll pin below the manual safety. It is hard to remove, it seems to have a crimp or bend in it to prevent its easy removal. Do not remove the solid pin above the magazine release. That pin retains the magazine catch and spring; removing it is not needed for this operation.
When you remove the roll pin the gun will not come apart. It is sort of clamped in the front. There is probably a clever technique for freeing the trigger assembly from the plastic frame, but I don't know it. I found what worked well was to tap on the exposed trigger frame assembly where the takedown lever latches with a punch, and that frees it up.
Some parts will figuratively speaking explode when you do this. There is a spring and plunger that fit between the plastic grip and the trigger assembly that act on the trigger bar, as shown in the picture above. Don't lose them, you'll need them. When you separate the plastic grip and the trigger assembly these parts will be free to disappear; whatever technique you use to free up the front part of the trigger assembly needs to also make sure these two small parts don't go far.
The slide stop and its spring will probably also come loose, as they are retained by being pinched in place inside the plastic grip. In the picture above the spring for the slide stop is actually in upside down; the shorter leg of the slide stop spring goes on the bottom of the trigger assembly; the picture shows it on the top.
The above pictures shows the right side of the trigger assembly, this is the internal mechanism of the pistol. As it is marked with the serial number, legally speaking (in the USA) it is the pistol. You will need to remove the two #1 phillips screws and the safety lever. The longer screw goes closer to the hammer. That longer screw also retains the ejector, it may come out when you remove the screw. No problem, just remember to put it back when you reassemble the gun.
At this point you can carefully pry the sideplate off the assembly. You will end up with a situation like that pictured above. The magazine safety is pushing the trigger bar down. Remove the trigger bar, remove the magazine safety (its the block and spring just behind the trigger, that's pushing the bar down), and replace the trigger bar.
Now you can reassemble the gun. Start by putting the sideplate back on. It retains the trigger, the trigger bar, and the axle for the safety, so it will have to be carefully wiggled into place. You may have to push the safety axle up a hair behind the plate with a small screwdriver or punch, so it will go into the hole for it in the sideplate, then pull the tool out and push the sideplate the rest of the way into place. Replace the safety lever and the screws. You may have to use a small punch to move the hammer blocking safety assembly back into alignment for the rear screw to go back into place. Don't forget to replace the ejector if it came out; it's retained by that rear screw.
Now you put the slide stop and its spring back into place, and put the trigger bar spring and plunger into place. Now you can tuck the entire assembly back into the plastic grip frame. Before you replace the roll pin, pull the trigger without the magazine in place and make sure it now works the hammer. If it doesn't you probably didn't get the trigger bar spring and plunger back into place. When you're sure everything works, reinstall the roll pin. Now you can reassemble the rest of the pistol following the factory directions.
One downside to removing the magazine safety is that the magazine will no longer be forcefully ejected from the gun when you push the mag release button. You may have to pull it out. I don't consider this to be a downside, but some folks might.
As noted above, now the gun will work whether a magazine is in place or not. Supervise the use of the firearm accordingly. If you decide to sell/give it away consider reinstalling the safety. Always be sure that anyone you teach anything about firearms knows that with every auto pistol removing the magazine is not substitute for clearing the chamber and removing the magazine. Merely removing the magazine does not make the pistol safe in any sense of the word, whether the pistol has a magazine safety, or not. Devices like the one on this pistol encourage that erroneous thinking.
Wednesday, August 15, 2012
Bernardelli Model 60
In addition to the line of pocket pistols noted in another article on this page, Vincenzo Bernardelli also made medium frame size pistols.
Model VB - Made in the 1950's in calibers .22, .32 and .380.
Model 60 - Started in 1960?, made in .22, .32 and .380. .22 one has an aluminum frame, the others have a steel one.
Model USA - same as model 60, made to comply with GCA by adding a slide mounted, firing pin blocking safety, thumbrest grip and adjustable rear sight. Several importers including Spesco Corp, Atlanta, GA.
Model 80 - same as Model USA, imported by Interarms.
Model 90 - a target version of the Model 80, in .22, with an extended barrel, removable front sight, adjustable rear sight, but no firing pin block safety. Steel frame. Imported by Interarms.
Model 100 - another target version of the Model 80. Imported by Interarms.
.
Model VB - Made in the 1950's in calibers .22, .32 and .380.
Model 60 - Started in 1960?, made in .22, .32 and .380. .22 one has an aluminum frame, the others have a steel one.
Model USA - same as model 60, made to comply with GCA by adding a slide mounted, firing pin blocking safety, thumbrest grip and adjustable rear sight. Several importers including Spesco Corp, Atlanta, GA.
Model 80 - same as Model USA, imported by Interarms.
Model 90 - a target version of the Model 80, in .22, with an extended barrel, removable front sight, adjustable rear sight, but no firing pin block safety. Steel frame. Imported by Interarms.
Model 100 - another target version of the Model 80. Imported by Interarms.
![]() |
| Model 60, left side. |
![]() |
| Model 60 right side. |
![]() |
| Fixed sights on Model 60 |
![]() |
| Slide Markings, Model 60. |
![]() |
| Model VB in .22, left side. |
![]() |
| Model VB, right side. |
![]() |
| proofmarks on Model VB |
![]() |
| Slide markings, Model VB. |
![]() |
| .380 magazine for Model VB. |
![]() |
| Model 100. |
![]() |
| Model 100 |
![]() |
| Model 100 |
![]() |
| Model 100 |
![]() |
| Import Markings on Model USA |
![]() |
| Model USA in .380 |
Thursday, February 23, 2012
THE OWEN GUN
THE OWEN GUN
By James O. Bardwell
HISTORY
The Owen gun was designed by an Australian inventor, Evelyn Owen, between 1938-41. It was the first submachine gun either designed or made in Australia, and came just in time for use in World War II. The production Owen gun was improved by design input from Gerard Wardell, an executive at Lysaght's Newcastle Works Pty. Ltd., the firm that oversaw the making of the gun, as well as making many of the components at their Port Kembla, New South Wales, facility. The story of how Lysaght's found Owen and his gun is rather colorful. Owen's family lived adjacent to Vincent Wardell, brother of Gerard and another executive at Lysaght's. In 1940 Vincent Wardell discovered a prototype gun in a sack behind the stairs at Owen's home, after Owen left it there for a moment. Owen got to talking to Wardell about the prototype, and his unsuccessful attempts to interest the military (Owen was then a private in the Army), and the project took off from there. Lysaght's got Owen assigned by the Army to assist them with his gun. Owen was discharged from the Army in 1942, and then left Lysaght's in 1943. He then ran a lumber mill and died in 1949, at age 33.
Lysaght's was a sheet steel fabricating company, and outside the Australian military procurement process. As the gun was designed and manufactured outside the regular channels, there was resistance to it on the part of the Australian military. The effect of this resistance, and how pronounced it was, is a matter of controversy even now, with two recent books on this subject. Gerard Wardell, together with his brother Vincent, worked hard to get the gun accepted by the military. They enlisted help from the press, to gain public support, as well as from friendly government employees, both military and civilian. Military officials favored the Austen, a locally modified version of the British Sten gun (see Machine Gun News, October 1993, page 20), despite the Austen's poorer performance in military trials of both guns.
In the end both were made, although the Owen was made in greater numbers (approximately 45,000, versus approximately 20,000 Austen's), and reportedly favored by troops over the Austen. Approximately 12,000 Owen guns were made with a solid trigger frame, and around 33,000 with a skeletonized trigger frame. The parts for both otherwise interchange, and both are marked Mk 1 on the gun, although the skeletonized ones are sometimes referred to as Mk 1* models. Most of the solid frame guns were made in 1942, and most of the skeletonized ones in 1943 and 1944, but production overlapped. The guns were marked with the last two digits of the year of production on the trigger frame, after the Mk 1 designation. Two hundred ten Mk 2 guns were also made and differ from the Mk 1 guns in the attachment of the buttstock, and the trigger group design, among other changes, all done to make the gun lighter.
Owen guns were used by Australia during World War II in battles with Japan in New Guinea, and throughout the Pacific theater. They served with the Australian military into the 1960's, and saw some use in Vietnam. They were replaced in the 1960's by the F1, which retained the Owen's top mounted magazine position, but took other features from the Patchett Sterling gun.
DESIGN & FUNCTION
The Owen is a select fire, open bolt design chambered for 9mm Parabellum. The firing pin is integral to the bolt face. It uses a 33 round double column, double feed magazine mounted on the top of the tube receiver, and ejects cases downward. Sighting is offset to the shooter's right, and the sights are not adjustable. One rather unique feature is the ejector, it is a tooth on the rear of the magazine. Owen thought that the ejector was a weak part of earlier submachine gun designs, and incorporating the ejector into the magazine meant that a faulty ejector was easily fixed by swapping out the offending magazine and trying another.
Such an arrangement also meant the bolt could be removed from the gun through the front of the receiver without interference from a fixed ejector. Having the bolt strip through the front of the receiver, instead of the rear, permitted a 1/2 inch thick metal ring at the rear of the receiver, separating the open slot for the cocking handle from the front portion of the receiver, where the bolt and spring are. The recoil spring guide shaft passes through a hole in this ring, and the cocking handle retains it on the other side of the ring. This arrangement effectively seals the part of the receiver where the bolt reciprocates, preventing the gun from being jammed by foreign material entering through the slot for the cocking handle. Dirt is kept from entering the area where the bolt moves at the front by tight fitting of the bolt to the receiver, in bands, in sort of the manner that piston rings function in an engine. This sealed receiver was a major reason why the Owen did so well in military trials as compared to its rivals. On an Austen or Sten, dirt or mud can enter the gun through the hole for the cocking handle, and jam the gun.
All major parts of the gun were stamped with at least the last three digits of the serial number, the full number is usually on the barrel, receiver, bolt components, and sometimes the trigger frame. Bolts and barrels were fitted to the gun, and interchangability without fitting may not be possible.
The trigger group is designed such that each movement of the selector allows more movement of the trigger. Thus the trigger is blocked in safe, has partial movement in semi auto (repetition in the Australian parlance) and full movement in full auto. The full auto position is all that is really needed to fire the gun. A partial depression of the trigger will trip the sear and allow semi auto fire, and a full depression will hold the sear out of engagement with the bolt and allow full auto fire. The gun was designed so that it would still fire full auto if one of the three springs used in the trigger assembly were broken or lost. The one that comes out the easiest is the trigger return spring, which is a flat steel spring, the others are coil springs. If this spring is missing or improperly installed the gun will fire full auto only.
All Owen guns originally had a blued finish, and all I have seen showed traces of green camouflage paint on the metal parts, applied over the bluing. A black and white picture from the factory shows a World War II era gun as having contrasting light and dark camouflage paint on it. After the war the guns still held by Australia were Factory Thorough Repaired (F.T.R.) at S.A.F. Lithgow, and had their paint removed and were phosphated. They also had a sliding safety piece fitted, that blocked the cocking handle from moving, by sliding either in front of, or behind the cocking handle, blocking the handle's movement in its slot.
Nearly all Owen guns were fitted with Bakelite type plastic grips, although the gun in the J. Curtis Earl Automatic Weapons Collection at the Champlin Fighter Museum in Mesa, AZ has wood grips. Lysaght's made a number of presentation guns, this may be one of them.
There were several buttstocks made, all work on any Mk 1 gun. There are skeletonized steel ones, with and without an SMLE oiler clip, as well as wood ones, both with lightening cuts and without, and with butt-traps and without.
Some guns were fitted with bayonet mount brackets on the barrel. The Owen had a bayonet designed expressly for it; some Austen guns were also fitted to accept it. The overall construction of the Owen is extremely durable, and rather heavy, around 9 lbs unloaded.
The receiver is tapered on the inside at the front to accept the interchangeable barrels, as well as having a shoulder at the rear to hold the 1/2 inch ring separating the open cocking handle slot from the rest of the receiver. Both this shoulder and the tapered barrel fitting meant the gun required more machine work than a straight tube design. The barrel removal feature was meant for cleaning, not exchanging barrels during use.
STRIPPING
The Owen was designed with ease of stripping, and as few small, easily lost parts as possible. No tools are needed for basic stripping. The barrel comes off the receiver by lifting up on the barrel catch, located in front of the mag well, and pulling the barrel off the front of the receiver. The bolt and recoil spring then come out of the front of the receiver by pulling straight out on the brass catch on the operating handle until it can be turned 90 degrees, and rested on the shelf in front of it. The barrel catch will have to be lifted for the bolt to clear. Further disassembly was not recommended for ordinary cleaning, but is easily done.
The end cap may be removed by prying it off, and the operating handle be removed from the butt end of the receiver. The trigger frame is removed from the receiver by unscrewing the large flat head screw on the underside of the trigger frame. The trigger assembly may be disassembled by sliding the retaining plate on the shooter's right side of the assembly up and off the pins. The selector can then be pushed out of the frame toward the shooter's left. The pins retaining the sear and trigger can then also be pushed out to the left, and the sear and spring can be lifted out of the top opening of the trigger frame. The trigger is still held in the frame by the trigger spring, the other end is retained by a screw in the side of the grip. This may be removed by removing the screw, and lifting out. This is not necessary except to repair a broken spring, and can be difficult to reassemble. The extractor and spring are retained by a pin through the bolt. The recoil spring guide shaft is held into the bolt by a pin retained by a spring steel ring around the center of the bolt.
SHOOTING
My Owen gun is a joy to shoot. In over 800 rounds so far, there have been no malfunctions of any kind, even when using grungy Egyptian surplus. The gun performs as it should when set on semi auto, only firing one shot, instead of two or three, as some open bolt guns do. With the selector set for full auto, the operator can easily squeeze the trigger part way and fire single shots, or depress the trigger for bursts. The hole in the rear sight is too large for accurate aiming; the gun was apparently meant to be fired from the hip. However, despite a rather pitted barrel, and crude sights, it is accurate, allowing the shooter to hold all 33 shots on a man sized silhouette at 25 yards. Muzzle rise is minimal, and emptying a whole magazine in one burst is controllable, due in part to the weight of the gun, as well as its dual grip design. The downward ejection makes for easy collection of spent brass. The one irritating aspect of shooting the Owen is that the bolt does not lock back on an empty magazine; there is no bolt lock.
The gun also functions without problem when held sideways, or upside down. The ejection was not very vigorous upside down, but the tooth on the mag, in combination with the next round in the mag (or the magazine follower on the last round) kicked each empty out and to the right and left, alternately. This test was more for fun than demonstrating any tactical feature, but it was interesting to see that the cases did not fall back into the action.
The magazine is very easy to load, no tool is needed, in contrast to the single feed design of the Sten magazine, also used on the Austen.
The Owen is an excellent submachine gun. Its weight and length may make it obsolete now, but considering controllability, durability, and function it is the equal of any submachine gun. The Owen does everything you could ask of one. And keeps on doing it. Certainly no better submachine gun was fielded during World War II. Although the gun seems to be rather rare in the U.S., an Owen is also an ideal civilian sport submachine gun, as it fires many rounds in a session without jams or excessive heating, is easy to maintain, and very durable.
Thanks to Chris Lares at the Champlin Fighter Museum, Mesa, AZ for permitting me to examine and photograph the Owen gun in their collection.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Skennerton, Ian. Small Arms Identification Series 9mm Austen Mk 1 & 9mm Owen Mk 1 Sub-machine Guns, Self published, 1994. North American distributor, I.D.S.A. Books, Piqua, OH.
Smith, Kevin. Owen Gun Files, The - An Australian Wartime Controversy, Turton & Armstrong, Sydney, Australia, 1994.
Wardman, Wayne. The Owen Gun, self published, 1991.
CAPTIONS
Figure 1: Bill Bardwell firing an Owen Mk1.
Figure 2: Owen Mk 1 disassembled into its major components.
Figure 3: Owen Mk 1 left side view.
Figure 4: Owen Mk 1 right side view.
Figure 5: Detail of the Owen magazine. The metal projection on the rear wall, between the feed lips, is the ejector.
Figure 6: Detail of an Owen trigger frame, with the selector removed, to show "S", "R", and "A" markings. Not all trigger frames are so marked.
Figure 7: Detail of the Owen bolt. The ejector rides in the milled slot above the integral firing pin.
Figure 8: An Owen gun with a finned barrel. This gun, made in 1942, is in the J. Curtis Earl Automatic Weapons Collection at the Champlin Fighter Museum in Mesa, AZ. Also note the wood grip.
Figure 9: Markings on the trigger frame of the Owen gun at the Champlin Fighter Museum. It reads, "OWEN 9MM MK1.42 LYSAGHT PK. AUSTRALIA PAT. PENDING." The bottom line is the serial number. PK stands for Port Kembla. The Owen gun's tube body, considered the receiver by the B.A.T.F., is unmarked except for the serial number.
Credit: All photos by the author.
By James O. Bardwell
HISTORY
The Owen gun was designed by an Australian inventor, Evelyn Owen, between 1938-41. It was the first submachine gun either designed or made in Australia, and came just in time for use in World War II. The production Owen gun was improved by design input from Gerard Wardell, an executive at Lysaght's Newcastle Works Pty. Ltd., the firm that oversaw the making of the gun, as well as making many of the components at their Port Kembla, New South Wales, facility. The story of how Lysaght's found Owen and his gun is rather colorful. Owen's family lived adjacent to Vincent Wardell, brother of Gerard and another executive at Lysaght's. In 1940 Vincent Wardell discovered a prototype gun in a sack behind the stairs at Owen's home, after Owen left it there for a moment. Owen got to talking to Wardell about the prototype, and his unsuccessful attempts to interest the military (Owen was then a private in the Army), and the project took off from there. Lysaght's got Owen assigned by the Army to assist them with his gun. Owen was discharged from the Army in 1942, and then left Lysaght's in 1943. He then ran a lumber mill and died in 1949, at age 33.
Lysaght's was a sheet steel fabricating company, and outside the Australian military procurement process. As the gun was designed and manufactured outside the regular channels, there was resistance to it on the part of the Australian military. The effect of this resistance, and how pronounced it was, is a matter of controversy even now, with two recent books on this subject. Gerard Wardell, together with his brother Vincent, worked hard to get the gun accepted by the military. They enlisted help from the press, to gain public support, as well as from friendly government employees, both military and civilian. Military officials favored the Austen, a locally modified version of the British Sten gun (see Machine Gun News, October 1993, page 20), despite the Austen's poorer performance in military trials of both guns.
In the end both were made, although the Owen was made in greater numbers (approximately 45,000, versus approximately 20,000 Austen's), and reportedly favored by troops over the Austen. Approximately 12,000 Owen guns were made with a solid trigger frame, and around 33,000 with a skeletonized trigger frame. The parts for both otherwise interchange, and both are marked Mk 1 on the gun, although the skeletonized ones are sometimes referred to as Mk 1* models. Most of the solid frame guns were made in 1942, and most of the skeletonized ones in 1943 and 1944, but production overlapped. The guns were marked with the last two digits of the year of production on the trigger frame, after the Mk 1 designation. Two hundred ten Mk 2 guns were also made and differ from the Mk 1 guns in the attachment of the buttstock, and the trigger group design, among other changes, all done to make the gun lighter.
Owen guns were used by Australia during World War II in battles with Japan in New Guinea, and throughout the Pacific theater. They served with the Australian military into the 1960's, and saw some use in Vietnam. They were replaced in the 1960's by the F1, which retained the Owen's top mounted magazine position, but took other features from the Patchett Sterling gun.
DESIGN & FUNCTION
The Owen is a select fire, open bolt design chambered for 9mm Parabellum. The firing pin is integral to the bolt face. It uses a 33 round double column, double feed magazine mounted on the top of the tube receiver, and ejects cases downward. Sighting is offset to the shooter's right, and the sights are not adjustable. One rather unique feature is the ejector, it is a tooth on the rear of the magazine. Owen thought that the ejector was a weak part of earlier submachine gun designs, and incorporating the ejector into the magazine meant that a faulty ejector was easily fixed by swapping out the offending magazine and trying another.
Such an arrangement also meant the bolt could be removed from the gun through the front of the receiver without interference from a fixed ejector. Having the bolt strip through the front of the receiver, instead of the rear, permitted a 1/2 inch thick metal ring at the rear of the receiver, separating the open slot for the cocking handle from the front portion of the receiver, where the bolt and spring are. The recoil spring guide shaft passes through a hole in this ring, and the cocking handle retains it on the other side of the ring. This arrangement effectively seals the part of the receiver where the bolt reciprocates, preventing the gun from being jammed by foreign material entering through the slot for the cocking handle. Dirt is kept from entering the area where the bolt moves at the front by tight fitting of the bolt to the receiver, in bands, in sort of the manner that piston rings function in an engine. This sealed receiver was a major reason why the Owen did so well in military trials as compared to its rivals. On an Austen or Sten, dirt or mud can enter the gun through the hole for the cocking handle, and jam the gun.
All major parts of the gun were stamped with at least the last three digits of the serial number, the full number is usually on the barrel, receiver, bolt components, and sometimes the trigger frame. Bolts and barrels were fitted to the gun, and interchangability without fitting may not be possible.
The trigger group is designed such that each movement of the selector allows more movement of the trigger. Thus the trigger is blocked in safe, has partial movement in semi auto (repetition in the Australian parlance) and full movement in full auto. The full auto position is all that is really needed to fire the gun. A partial depression of the trigger will trip the sear and allow semi auto fire, and a full depression will hold the sear out of engagement with the bolt and allow full auto fire. The gun was designed so that it would still fire full auto if one of the three springs used in the trigger assembly were broken or lost. The one that comes out the easiest is the trigger return spring, which is a flat steel spring, the others are coil springs. If this spring is missing or improperly installed the gun will fire full auto only.
All Owen guns originally had a blued finish, and all I have seen showed traces of green camouflage paint on the metal parts, applied over the bluing. A black and white picture from the factory shows a World War II era gun as having contrasting light and dark camouflage paint on it. After the war the guns still held by Australia were Factory Thorough Repaired (F.T.R.) at S.A.F. Lithgow, and had their paint removed and were phosphated. They also had a sliding safety piece fitted, that blocked the cocking handle from moving, by sliding either in front of, or behind the cocking handle, blocking the handle's movement in its slot.
Nearly all Owen guns were fitted with Bakelite type plastic grips, although the gun in the J. Curtis Earl Automatic Weapons Collection at the Champlin Fighter Museum in Mesa, AZ has wood grips. Lysaght's made a number of presentation guns, this may be one of them.
There were several buttstocks made, all work on any Mk 1 gun. There are skeletonized steel ones, with and without an SMLE oiler clip, as well as wood ones, both with lightening cuts and without, and with butt-traps and without.
Some guns were fitted with bayonet mount brackets on the barrel. The Owen had a bayonet designed expressly for it; some Austen guns were also fitted to accept it. The overall construction of the Owen is extremely durable, and rather heavy, around 9 lbs unloaded.
The receiver is tapered on the inside at the front to accept the interchangeable barrels, as well as having a shoulder at the rear to hold the 1/2 inch ring separating the open cocking handle slot from the rest of the receiver. Both this shoulder and the tapered barrel fitting meant the gun required more machine work than a straight tube design. The barrel removal feature was meant for cleaning, not exchanging barrels during use.
STRIPPING
The Owen was designed with ease of stripping, and as few small, easily lost parts as possible. No tools are needed for basic stripping. The barrel comes off the receiver by lifting up on the barrel catch, located in front of the mag well, and pulling the barrel off the front of the receiver. The bolt and recoil spring then come out of the front of the receiver by pulling straight out on the brass catch on the operating handle until it can be turned 90 degrees, and rested on the shelf in front of it. The barrel catch will have to be lifted for the bolt to clear. Further disassembly was not recommended for ordinary cleaning, but is easily done.
The end cap may be removed by prying it off, and the operating handle be removed from the butt end of the receiver. The trigger frame is removed from the receiver by unscrewing the large flat head screw on the underside of the trigger frame. The trigger assembly may be disassembled by sliding the retaining plate on the shooter's right side of the assembly up and off the pins. The selector can then be pushed out of the frame toward the shooter's left. The pins retaining the sear and trigger can then also be pushed out to the left, and the sear and spring can be lifted out of the top opening of the trigger frame. The trigger is still held in the frame by the trigger spring, the other end is retained by a screw in the side of the grip. This may be removed by removing the screw, and lifting out. This is not necessary except to repair a broken spring, and can be difficult to reassemble. The extractor and spring are retained by a pin through the bolt. The recoil spring guide shaft is held into the bolt by a pin retained by a spring steel ring around the center of the bolt.
SHOOTING
My Owen gun is a joy to shoot. In over 800 rounds so far, there have been no malfunctions of any kind, even when using grungy Egyptian surplus. The gun performs as it should when set on semi auto, only firing one shot, instead of two or three, as some open bolt guns do. With the selector set for full auto, the operator can easily squeeze the trigger part way and fire single shots, or depress the trigger for bursts. The hole in the rear sight is too large for accurate aiming; the gun was apparently meant to be fired from the hip. However, despite a rather pitted barrel, and crude sights, it is accurate, allowing the shooter to hold all 33 shots on a man sized silhouette at 25 yards. Muzzle rise is minimal, and emptying a whole magazine in one burst is controllable, due in part to the weight of the gun, as well as its dual grip design. The downward ejection makes for easy collection of spent brass. The one irritating aspect of shooting the Owen is that the bolt does not lock back on an empty magazine; there is no bolt lock.
The gun also functions without problem when held sideways, or upside down. The ejection was not very vigorous upside down, but the tooth on the mag, in combination with the next round in the mag (or the magazine follower on the last round) kicked each empty out and to the right and left, alternately. This test was more for fun than demonstrating any tactical feature, but it was interesting to see that the cases did not fall back into the action.
The magazine is very easy to load, no tool is needed, in contrast to the single feed design of the Sten magazine, also used on the Austen.
The Owen is an excellent submachine gun. Its weight and length may make it obsolete now, but considering controllability, durability, and function it is the equal of any submachine gun. The Owen does everything you could ask of one. And keeps on doing it. Certainly no better submachine gun was fielded during World War II. Although the gun seems to be rather rare in the U.S., an Owen is also an ideal civilian sport submachine gun, as it fires many rounds in a session without jams or excessive heating, is easy to maintain, and very durable.
Thanks to Chris Lares at the Champlin Fighter Museum, Mesa, AZ for permitting me to examine and photograph the Owen gun in their collection.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Skennerton, Ian. Small Arms Identification Series 9mm Austen Mk 1 & 9mm Owen Mk 1 Sub-machine Guns, Self published, 1994. North American distributor, I.D.S.A. Books, Piqua, OH.
Smith, Kevin. Owen Gun Files, The - An Australian Wartime Controversy, Turton & Armstrong, Sydney, Australia, 1994.
Wardman, Wayne. The Owen Gun, self published, 1991.
CAPTIONS
Figure 1: Bill Bardwell firing an Owen Mk1.
Figure 2: Owen Mk 1 disassembled into its major components.
Figure 3: Owen Mk 1 left side view.
Figure 4: Owen Mk 1 right side view.
Figure 5: Detail of the Owen magazine. The metal projection on the rear wall, between the feed lips, is the ejector.
Figure 6: Detail of an Owen trigger frame, with the selector removed, to show "S", "R", and "A" markings. Not all trigger frames are so marked.
Figure 7: Detail of the Owen bolt. The ejector rides in the milled slot above the integral firing pin.
Figure 8: An Owen gun with a finned barrel. This gun, made in 1942, is in the J. Curtis Earl Automatic Weapons Collection at the Champlin Fighter Museum in Mesa, AZ. Also note the wood grip.
Figure 9: Markings on the trigger frame of the Owen gun at the Champlin Fighter Museum. It reads, "OWEN 9MM MK1.42 LYSAGHT PK. AUSTRALIA PAT. PENDING." The bottom line is the serial number. PK stands for Port Kembla. The Owen gun's tube body, considered the receiver by the B.A.T.F., is unmarked except for the serial number.
Credit: All photos by the author.
Friday, November 11, 2011
Another Colorado made firearm - the Powell Knife Pistol
The Powell Knife Pistol (PKP) is a single shot handgun. It is configured as a fixed blade knife, with a pistol barrel along the top of the knife blade. According to magazine articles about the gun, it was inspired by a relative of the inventor, James B. Powell, who wanted something he could carry unconcealed while he worked in rural areas without attracting too much attention. Many people carried a knife in a sheath, so the idea of a combination of a fixed blade knife and a modern single shot pistol was made into a reality. Of course combinations of knives and pistols have existed for many years, about since pistols were created hundreds of years ago. Even today, modern bayonets (including bayonets for handguns, such as made by CZ to mount on the rails on some of their pistols) combine the idea of a firearm and a blade. However the PKP is a fun and elegant example of this type. Additionally, in the USA, the PKP is not considered an "Any Other Weapon" by ATF as other so called disguised firearms are (such as pen guns, cane guns and the like). This means it is considered an ordinary handgun, not requiring special registration or transfer procedures. Apparently this is because ATF judged that it had enough of a grip at an angle to the bore that it was like a regular pistol.
They were made in a variety of calibers over the years, including .22 rimfire (both long rifle and magnum) as well as in 9mm Para, .38 Special and .45ACP. Chamber sleeves were offered with some models to allow the use of additional chamberings. I have also seen black powder muzzle loading style examples, which have the benefit of not being considered a firearm for purposes of Federal law in the USA. The examples I have seen all exhibit very high quality of manufacture and of materials. Fit and finish is extremely nice, and they work as they should. The blade is not delivered with a sharp edge, it is ground to the point that a sharp edge could be easily made.
James B. Powell secured two design patents on the knife pistol, D275509 and D400632.
The PKP was made in fairly limited numbers, by various manufacturers in Arizona and Colorado. I believe all the various entities included James Powell. So far as my research shows, the first entity to market and make the PKP was Powell and Brown Industries, Inc. out of Tucson, AZ. It was formed in 1985 and was terminated in 1988, with the corp number -0513202-0. Also formed in 1985 was P.K.P. Inc., also out of Tucson, AZ. It was also terminated in 1988. corp number -0178667-0. Later, Powell Knife Pistol Incorporated was formed in 1993 also in Tucson, AZ, and was dissolved in 2001.
Later, PKP Enterprises, LLC was formed in 2002 in Colorado. It was dissolved in 2009. Its owners were James B. Powell and James A. Burbach. Also, San Juan Enterprise, LLC was formed in 2004 in Colorado, with its owner being James B. Powell. It was still in good standing with the Secretary of State in 2011 (at the time of writing). Although I understand San Juan Enterprise is not currently operating, it does have a very interesting web site, which has pictures of the last model made, the "Sierra Madre" in .45 ACP, and pictures of some very ornately decorated examples. Although San Juan Enterprise, LLC was a limited liability company it appears from the ATF records (below) that the FFL was held in Mr. Powell's name personally, not in the name of the LLC. The LLC designation is also not marked on the example pictured below.
They were made in a variety of calibers over the years, including .22 rimfire (both long rifle and magnum) as well as in 9mm Para, .38 Special and .45ACP. Chamber sleeves were offered with some models to allow the use of additional chamberings. I have also seen black powder muzzle loading style examples, which have the benefit of not being considered a firearm for purposes of Federal law in the USA. The examples I have seen all exhibit very high quality of manufacture and of materials. Fit and finish is extremely nice, and they work as they should. The blade is not delivered with a sharp edge, it is ground to the point that a sharp edge could be easily made.
James B. Powell secured two design patents on the knife pistol, D275509 and D400632.
The PKP was made in fairly limited numbers, by various manufacturers in Arizona and Colorado. I believe all the various entities included James Powell. So far as my research shows, the first entity to market and make the PKP was Powell and Brown Industries, Inc. out of Tucson, AZ. It was formed in 1985 and was terminated in 1988, with the corp number -0513202-0. Also formed in 1985 was P.K.P. Inc., also out of Tucson, AZ. It was also terminated in 1988. corp number -0178667-0. Later, Powell Knife Pistol Incorporated was formed in 1993 also in Tucson, AZ, and was dissolved in 2001.
Later, PKP Enterprises, LLC was formed in 2002 in Colorado. It was dissolved in 2009. Its owners were James B. Powell and James A. Burbach. Also, San Juan Enterprise, LLC was formed in 2004 in Colorado, with its owner being James B. Powell. It was still in good standing with the Secretary of State in 2011 (at the time of writing). Although I understand San Juan Enterprise is not currently operating, it does have a very interesting web site, which has pictures of the last model made, the "Sierra Madre" in .45 ACP, and pictures of some very ornately decorated examples. Although San Juan Enterprise, LLC was a limited liability company it appears from the ATF records (below) that the FFL was held in Mr. Powell's name personally, not in the name of the LLC. The LLC designation is also not marked on the example pictured below.
There was a cover story on the PKP in the May 1995 issue of Gun World magazine, which is what first got me interested in the pistol. There was also one in American Handgunner, May-June 2006. If the link still works, you can see that article here.
While not all the ATF firearms manufacturing records are available on the internet, those for the years 1998 to 2009 are available. Licensed manufacturers have to report to ATF certain statistics on handguns they make, mostly for collection of excise taxes. The internet available information on the PKP production is as follows:
Year Licensee Name Made
2009 James B. Powell 15 pistols in 9mm, 2 pistols in calibers between 9mm and .50
2008 James B. Powell 14 pistols in calibers between 9mm and .50
2007 James B. Powell 14 pistols in calibers between 9mm and .50
2006 James B. Powell 14 pistols in calibers between 9mm and .50
2005 no record
2004 no record
2003 no record
2002 no record
2001 no record
2000 no record
1999 no record
1998 Powell Knife Pistol Inc. 25 pistols in .38 caliber
Here are some pictures of a San Juan Enterprise, Ignacio, CO marked example of the PKP. I believe it is the Sierra Madre model. Operation varies a little between models, depending on their caliber. This one is in .45ACP, although it is not marked as to its chambering. The cartridge is held in the chamber on the front edge of the brass casing, as it is a rimless cartridge. The cartridge fits into the chamber flush with its end. It came with one page of directions/description.
Operating the gun is as follows. To load first, it the hammer must be in the half cock position. Then the latch on the left side (from the shooter's perspective) is pulled back toward the shooter to release the the captive barrel latch pin which pushes out from right to left . This captive pin is not present on some models in lighter chamberings than .45. Then the barrel tips down to break the action open, like a single shot shotgun A cartridge is inserted into the chamber, and the action closed and the captive pin pushed back into position.
To fire it the hammer is cocked (it is single action only), and while depressing the half moon shaped grip safety, the spur trigger is pulled. Not all models have a grip safety. The trigger can be pulled and the hammer will drop even if the grip safety is not fully depressed, however the gun will not fire. The grip safety operates a firing pin block, it does not block the hammer or trigger, like the grip safety on a 1911 pistol or an Uzi, for example. The hammer has a half cock position as well, the action will not open if the hammer is in its fully fired position.





Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Stoeger coach gun buttstock bolt size
The stock bolt for these guns is 1/4 x 28 tpi. Although they are made in Brazil by E R Amantino, they use an inch pattern thread on the bolt that holds the buttstock on the gun.
Incidentally, this is the same thread pattern used on M16 rifles to hold the pistol grip onto the lower receiver.
Incidentally, this is the same thread pattern used on M16 rifles to hold the pistol grip onto the lower receiver.
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Another Colorado made gun Feather Industries Inc. AT-22
Although made by various entities and with various names, the AT-22 has always been a homegrown Colorado gun. It was first made in Boulder, Colorado, then operations moved to Trinidad. Later the design was revived by a new company, America West Industries, LLC, located in Eaton, CO.
The AT-22 is a lightweight .22 semi-auto rifle. It was made with a 20 round magazine, although smaller capacity ones have been offered to markets that prohibit larger capacity magazines, and also during the 1994-2004 Federal assault weapon ban. The magazine itself is very similar in design to the magazine for the Armalite AR7 rifle, although it latches in a different manner on the two guns. The AT-22 has always been offered as a closed bolt firing gun, although its design is similar to guns that were originally designed to be open bolt guns and later had the design was converted to a closed bolt one.
In particular the AT-22 uses a striker held in the cocked position by a sear, with two springs, one to drive the bolt, the other to drive the striker. This separation of the striker and bolt into two parts, together with the use of a sear to hold the striker when cocked, is one way designers changed open bolt guns (either originally full auto or semi-auto) into closed bolt models that satisfied ATF that the design was not too easily converted into a machine gun. I have never seen or heard of an open bolt semi-auto version of this gun, or a registered machine gun version, although it was made before 1986, so theoretically registered machine gun examples (either factory made or conversions) could exist.
As originally made the AT-22 has a 17 inch long barrel and a collapsing stock. The barrel is one inch longer than the 16" minimum required of non-NFA firearms because the overall length of the gun with the stock collapsed falls right at 26 inches with it. This keeps the gun from being considered a short barreled rifle (or a pistol) in states that measure overall length with the stock in its closed position, rather than its open position, as ATF does. The barrel is easily removed, it is held in place with a nut that threads onto the end of the tubular receiver. With the stock collapsed and the barrel removed it makes a compact package for transport. In my experience they are reasonably accurate for plinking purposes, and are reliable and fun to shoot.
Here is a scan of the manual for the AT-22 and Mini-AT pistol.
History
Feather Enterprises was a sole proprietorship trade name registered in 1979 by Lynn Schick. Feather Enterprises changed its name to Precision Ballistics, Inc. with trade name of Feather Enterprises in 1986.
The company changed its name from Precision Ballistics, Inc. to Feather Industries, Inc. in 1987. They were always located on Central Ave. in Boulder, Colorado, first at 2500 Central Ave., then at 2300 Central Ave., Unit K. Mervin L. Chapman was the president of Feather Industries, Inc.
The very first AT-22 guns were marked "Feather Ent. Boulder CO." on two lines. The brown cardboard box listed the manufacturer as Feather Enterprises. The first AT-22 guns used an M16 pistol grip, made by Lone Star Ordnance, rather than the later proprietary pistol grip. They also had an aluminum channel holding the trigger and sear parts, rather than a plastic one. The serial number was marked on the aluminum channel on these early guns, rather than the aluminum tube that holds the bolt and striker. Finally these guns had sights that were made of metal, rather than the plastic on later guns. Here are pics of Feather Enterprises AT-22, serial number A0270 which has these early features. Presumably it was made in 1985, in the first year of production:

Here are some overall pictures of the rifle. The barrel on it is a later barrel, not correct for this early a gun.


These early guns has the trigger frame part marked with the serial number, and being treated as the receiver, and therefore as the "firearm" for legal purposes. However, after Feather started offering the pistol version of the AT-22 (shown below) ATF became concerned that the upper assembly, which was just being treated as a part, not the "firearm" could be swapped between the pistols and rifles, thereby creating a short barreled rifle, which might not have been registered before the swap was made. To appease ATF, Feather started treating the aluminum tube as the receiver, marking it with the serial number. This mean that the short barreled pistol upper was a separate firearm in itself, and the parts to make the rifle into a short barreled rifle were not being sold as parts, but as a legally regulated firearm. All of this is silly of course, since a hacksaw can turn any of the rifles into a short barreled rifle, albeit one that is less elegant than putting the pistol upper on a should stocked lower. In the years since 1985-86 when this issue arose short barreled upper parts are sold without any issue for firearms such as the AR-15, and the criminally minded can easily make an AR-15 style firearm into an unregistered short barreled rifle quite easily. Of course the secondary effect of this change, making the upper receiver the firearm instead of the lower receiver, is that the upper off an early gun could be combined with the lower off a later gun and create an AT-22 with no serial number at all. Given that no serial numbers were removed, altered or obliterated in making such a Frankenstein gun, I don't see a legal problem with this step either. I would have thought that the danger of making unserialized guns would have outweighed the danger of unregistered short barreled rifles, and thus prompted ATF not to pressure Feather into changing the location of the serial number and which part is the "firearm" legally speaking.
On later production Feather went to a white colored cardboard box. Here are some pictures of an AT-22 rifle, SN A1743, probably made in 1986-87. The barrel shown here is the proper one for the early guns, with the threaded on muzzle attachment, and the steps for a bipod right in front of the muzzle nut. As noted on the manual shown in the pictures, it was made in the Precision Ballistics, Inc., dba Feather Enterprises days:



Here is a scan of the Feather Industries, Inc. 1990 catalog and retail price list:





Feather AT-22 rifles were in made several serial number series:
Axxxx where the x was a number.
Bxxxxx where the x was a number.
MOxxxx and MPxxxx (later AWI guns)
Mini-AT pistols had the serial number MAxxxx
Later on the guns were changed slightly, catches to keep the end caps from unscrewing were added. The bolt had slots milled into it, presumably to provide a place for crud to accumulate, allowing it to fire more shots between cleaning. Here are pictures of a AWI made AT-22, with a trigger group housing with Trinidad, CO markings:


A Feather AT-9 was the murder weapon in a notorious California crime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Ewell
Neat Feather company promotional video from You Tube
At the end of 1994 or so, Feather moved to 37600 Liberty Drive, Trinidad Colorado, with incentives from the county government to relocate to southern Colorado. The move was poorly timed with the Federal assault weapon ban, which banned Feather's AT-22 and AT-9 rifles as they had been originally configured. In particular their combination of a collapsing stock and a pistol grip was prohibited. The guns were redesigned with a non-collapsing wire stock, but by mid-1996 their main creditor sued them (1:96-cv-01265, U.S. District Court, Colorado) to repossess much if not all of their equipment. Feather Industries, Inc. was defunct at that point.
I believe a California firearms company, Mitchell Arms in Santa Ana, CA bought the assets of Feather and announced plans to make and sell the AT-22, AT-9 and a two shot pistol called the Guardian Angel that Feather had announced, but never really produced. However Mitchell Arms went out of business before any of that happened. I have never seen a Mitchell Arms marked Feather product. Sarco Inc. has a supply of boxes Mitchell had made for the Guardian Angel pistol (they come with a guardian angel charm!) but the pistols themselves were never made beyond prototypes, so far as I know.
A new entity, America West Industries, LLC (AWI) was formed in 1997 by James L. Malone. They ended up with an inventory of the Trinidad made AT-22 guns and/or parts. Now located in Eaton, Colorado, AWI markets a number of neat rifles on the AT-22 and AT-9 design. Their web site at this time (May 2011).
Here are pictures showing the "pre-ban" style collapsing stock, and the current, post-ban style detachable stock. The bottom stock is the current one; the wire the stock is made out of changes diameter partway, to prevent it from collapsing. Instead it snaps in place on the back, or it can be reversed and stowed in the rifle from the front. The pre-ban style stock will fit on current guns, and is available from AWI as of this writing.


Some pictures of the AT-22 pistol, the fairly rare Mini-AT, made by Feather Industries, Inc. This one has the upper receiver tube serialized as the firearm. Note the different front sight. The barrel will not interchange between this model and the rifle.



Here are pictures of a Feather Enterprises Mini-AT pistol, with an earlier style aluminum trigger frame, and the serial number marked on the trigger frame, not the upper receiver tube:



Production statistics for Feather Enterprises and Feather Industries, Inc., per ATF:
PISTOL PRODUCTION HISTORY
Year Number
1986 7
1987 279
1988 96
* all in .22 caliber.
RIFLE PRODUCTION HISTORY
Year Number of Rifles
1985 388
1986 1,570
1987 1,933
1988 1,894
1989 3,388
1990 2,963
1991 3,056
1992 2,079
1993 no report made to ATF
1994 1,759
According to ATF no further manufacturing reports were filed after 1994.
AWI production stats according to ATF AMFER reports
1998 not listed
1999 one .22 pistol, 18 rifles
2000 188 rifles
2001 196 rifles
2002 250 rifles
2003 288 rifles
2004 not listed
2005 511 rifles
2006 277 rifles
2007 127 rifles
2008 127 rifles
2009 111 rifles
The AT-22 is a lightweight .22 semi-auto rifle. It was made with a 20 round magazine, although smaller capacity ones have been offered to markets that prohibit larger capacity magazines, and also during the 1994-2004 Federal assault weapon ban. The magazine itself is very similar in design to the magazine for the Armalite AR7 rifle, although it latches in a different manner on the two guns. The AT-22 has always been offered as a closed bolt firing gun, although its design is similar to guns that were originally designed to be open bolt guns and later had the design was converted to a closed bolt one.
In particular the AT-22 uses a striker held in the cocked position by a sear, with two springs, one to drive the bolt, the other to drive the striker. This separation of the striker and bolt into two parts, together with the use of a sear to hold the striker when cocked, is one way designers changed open bolt guns (either originally full auto or semi-auto) into closed bolt models that satisfied ATF that the design was not too easily converted into a machine gun. I have never seen or heard of an open bolt semi-auto version of this gun, or a registered machine gun version, although it was made before 1986, so theoretically registered machine gun examples (either factory made or conversions) could exist.
As originally made the AT-22 has a 17 inch long barrel and a collapsing stock. The barrel is one inch longer than the 16" minimum required of non-NFA firearms because the overall length of the gun with the stock collapsed falls right at 26 inches with it. This keeps the gun from being considered a short barreled rifle (or a pistol) in states that measure overall length with the stock in its closed position, rather than its open position, as ATF does. The barrel is easily removed, it is held in place with a nut that threads onto the end of the tubular receiver. With the stock collapsed and the barrel removed it makes a compact package for transport. In my experience they are reasonably accurate for plinking purposes, and are reliable and fun to shoot.
Here is a scan of the manual for the AT-22 and Mini-AT pistol.
History
Feather Enterprises was a sole proprietorship trade name registered in 1979 by Lynn Schick. Feather Enterprises changed its name to Precision Ballistics, Inc. with trade name of Feather Enterprises in 1986.
The company changed its name from Precision Ballistics, Inc. to Feather Industries, Inc. in 1987. They were always located on Central Ave. in Boulder, Colorado, first at 2500 Central Ave., then at 2300 Central Ave., Unit K. Mervin L. Chapman was the president of Feather Industries, Inc.
The very first AT-22 guns were marked "Feather Ent. Boulder CO." on two lines. The brown cardboard box listed the manufacturer as Feather Enterprises. The first AT-22 guns used an M16 pistol grip, made by Lone Star Ordnance, rather than the later proprietary pistol grip. They also had an aluminum channel holding the trigger and sear parts, rather than a plastic one. The serial number was marked on the aluminum channel on these early guns, rather than the aluminum tube that holds the bolt and striker. Finally these guns had sights that were made of metal, rather than the plastic on later guns. Here are pics of Feather Enterprises AT-22, serial number A0270 which has these early features. Presumably it was made in 1985, in the first year of production:

Here are some overall pictures of the rifle. The barrel on it is a later barrel, not correct for this early a gun.

These early guns has the trigger frame part marked with the serial number, and being treated as the receiver, and therefore as the "firearm" for legal purposes. However, after Feather started offering the pistol version of the AT-22 (shown below) ATF became concerned that the upper assembly, which was just being treated as a part, not the "firearm" could be swapped between the pistols and rifles, thereby creating a short barreled rifle, which might not have been registered before the swap was made. To appease ATF, Feather started treating the aluminum tube as the receiver, marking it with the serial number. This mean that the short barreled pistol upper was a separate firearm in itself, and the parts to make the rifle into a short barreled rifle were not being sold as parts, but as a legally regulated firearm. All of this is silly of course, since a hacksaw can turn any of the rifles into a short barreled rifle, albeit one that is less elegant than putting the pistol upper on a should stocked lower. In the years since 1985-86 when this issue arose short barreled upper parts are sold without any issue for firearms such as the AR-15, and the criminally minded can easily make an AR-15 style firearm into an unregistered short barreled rifle quite easily. Of course the secondary effect of this change, making the upper receiver the firearm instead of the lower receiver, is that the upper off an early gun could be combined with the lower off a later gun and create an AT-22 with no serial number at all. Given that no serial numbers were removed, altered or obliterated in making such a Frankenstein gun, I don't see a legal problem with this step either. I would have thought that the danger of making unserialized guns would have outweighed the danger of unregistered short barreled rifles, and thus prompted ATF not to pressure Feather into changing the location of the serial number and which part is the "firearm" legally speaking.
On later production Feather went to a white colored cardboard box. Here are some pictures of an AT-22 rifle, SN A1743, probably made in 1986-87. The barrel shown here is the proper one for the early guns, with the threaded on muzzle attachment, and the steps for a bipod right in front of the muzzle nut. As noted on the manual shown in the pictures, it was made in the Precision Ballistics, Inc., dba Feather Enterprises days:



Here is a scan of the Feather Industries, Inc. 1990 catalog and retail price list:





Feather AT-22 rifles were in made several serial number series:
Axxxx where the x was a number.
Bxxxxx where the x was a number.
MOxxxx and MPxxxx (later AWI guns)
Mini-AT pistols had the serial number MAxxxx
Later on the guns were changed slightly, catches to keep the end caps from unscrewing were added. The bolt had slots milled into it, presumably to provide a place for crud to accumulate, allowing it to fire more shots between cleaning. Here are pictures of a AWI made AT-22, with a trigger group housing with Trinidad, CO markings:


A Feather AT-9 was the murder weapon in a notorious California crime. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dana_Ewell
Neat Feather company promotional video from You Tube
At the end of 1994 or so, Feather moved to 37600 Liberty Drive, Trinidad Colorado, with incentives from the county government to relocate to southern Colorado. The move was poorly timed with the Federal assault weapon ban, which banned Feather's AT-22 and AT-9 rifles as they had been originally configured. In particular their combination of a collapsing stock and a pistol grip was prohibited. The guns were redesigned with a non-collapsing wire stock, but by mid-1996 their main creditor sued them (1:96-cv-01265, U.S. District Court, Colorado) to repossess much if not all of their equipment. Feather Industries, Inc. was defunct at that point.
I believe a California firearms company, Mitchell Arms in Santa Ana, CA bought the assets of Feather and announced plans to make and sell the AT-22, AT-9 and a two shot pistol called the Guardian Angel that Feather had announced, but never really produced. However Mitchell Arms went out of business before any of that happened. I have never seen a Mitchell Arms marked Feather product. Sarco Inc. has a supply of boxes Mitchell had made for the Guardian Angel pistol (they come with a guardian angel charm!) but the pistols themselves were never made beyond prototypes, so far as I know.
A new entity, America West Industries, LLC (AWI) was formed in 1997 by James L. Malone. They ended up with an inventory of the Trinidad made AT-22 guns and/or parts. Now located in Eaton, Colorado, AWI markets a number of neat rifles on the AT-22 and AT-9 design. Their web site at this time (May 2011).
Here are pictures showing the "pre-ban" style collapsing stock, and the current, post-ban style detachable stock. The bottom stock is the current one; the wire the stock is made out of changes diameter partway, to prevent it from collapsing. Instead it snaps in place on the back, or it can be reversed and stowed in the rifle from the front. The pre-ban style stock will fit on current guns, and is available from AWI as of this writing.


Some pictures of the AT-22 pistol, the fairly rare Mini-AT, made by Feather Industries, Inc. This one has the upper receiver tube serialized as the firearm. Note the different front sight. The barrel will not interchange between this model and the rifle.



Here are pictures of a Feather Enterprises Mini-AT pistol, with an earlier style aluminum trigger frame, and the serial number marked on the trigger frame, not the upper receiver tube:



Production statistics for Feather Enterprises and Feather Industries, Inc., per ATF:
PISTOL PRODUCTION HISTORY
Year Number
1986 7
1987 279
1988 96
* all in .22 caliber.
RIFLE PRODUCTION HISTORY
Year Number of Rifles
1985 388
1986 1,570
1987 1,933
1988 1,894
1989 3,388
1990 2,963
1991 3,056
1992 2,079
1993 no report made to ATF
1994 1,759
According to ATF no further manufacturing reports were filed after 1994.
AWI production stats according to ATF AMFER reports
1998 not listed
1999 one .22 pistol, 18 rifles
2000 188 rifles
2001 196 rifles
2002 250 rifles
2003 288 rifles
2004 not listed
2005 511 rifles
2006 277 rifles
2007 127 rifles
2008 127 rifles
2009 111 rifles
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




























